Byย Collin Binkley | The Associated Press

A mural by artist Tene Smith is seen near the entrance of Chicago Women in Trades, a nonprofit dedicated to training and retaining women in the skilled construction trades is photographed April 1, 2025, at the facility in Chicago. (AP Photo/Claire Savage, File)
A mural by artist Tene Smith is seen near the entrance of Chicago Women in Trades, a nonprofit dedicated to training and retaining women in the skilled construction trades is photographed April 1, 2025, at the facility in Chicago. (AP Photo/Claire Savage, File)

WASHINGTON (AP) โ€” A federal judge on Thursday struck down two Trump administration actions aimed at eliminatingย diversity, equity and inclusionย programs at the nationโ€™s schools and universities.

In her ruling, U.S. District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland found that the Education Department violated the law when it threatened to cut federal funding from educational institutions that continued with DEI initiatives.

The guidance has been on hold since April when three federal judgesย blocked various portionsย of the Education Departmentโ€™s anti-DEI measures.

The ruling Thursday followed a motion for summary judgment from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, whichย challengedย the governmentโ€™s actions in a February lawsuit.

The case centers on two Education Department memos ordering schools and universities to end all โ€œrace-based decision-makingโ€ or face penalties up to a totalย loss of federal funding. Itโ€™s part of a campaign to end practices the Trump administration frames as discrimination against white and Asian American students.

The new ruling orders the department to scrap the guidance because it runs afoul of procedural requirements, though Gallagher wrote that she took no view on whether the policies were โ€œgood or bad, prudent or foolish, fair or unfair.โ€

Gallagher, who was appointed by President Donald Trump, rejected the governmentโ€™s argument that the memos simply served to remind schools that discrimination is illegal.

โ€œIt initiated a sea change in how the Department of Education regulates educational practices and classroom conduct, causing millions of educators to reasonably fear that their lawful, and even beneficial, speech might cause them or their schools to be punished,โ€ Gallagher wrote.

Democracy Forward, a legal advocacy firm representing the plaintiffs, called it an important victory over the administrationโ€™s attack on DEI.

โ€œThreatening teachers and sowing chaos in schools throughout America is part of the administrationโ€™s war on education, and today the people won,โ€ said Skye Perryman, the groupโ€™s president and CEO.

The Education Department did not immediately comment on Thursday.

The conflict started with aย Feb. 14 memoย declaring that any consideration of race in admissions, financial aid, hiring or other aspects of academic and student life would be considered a violation of federal civil rights law.

The memo dramatically expanded the governmentโ€™s interpretation of a 2023ย Supreme Court decisionย barring colleges from considering race in admissions decisions. The government argued the ruling applied not only to admissions but across all of education, forbidding โ€œrace-based preferencesโ€ of any kind.

โ€œEducational institutions have toxically indoctrinated students with the false premise that the United States is built upon โ€˜systemic and structural racismโ€™ and advanced discriminatory policies and practices,โ€ wrote Craig Trainor, the acting assistant secretary of the departmentโ€™s Office for Civil Rights.

A further memo in April asked state education agencies toย certifyย they were not using โ€œillegal DEI practices.โ€ Violators risked losing federal money and being prosecuted under the False Claims Act, it said.

In total, the guidance amounted to a full-scale reframing of the governmentโ€™s approach to civil rights in education. It took aim at policies that were created to address longstanding racial disparities, saying those practices were their own form of discrimination.

The memos drew a wave ofย backlashย from states and education groups that called it illegal government censorship.

In its lawsuit, the American Federation of Teachers said the government was imposing โ€œunclear and highly subjectiveโ€ limits on schools across the country. It said teachers and professors had to โ€œchoose between chilling their constitutionally protected speech and association or risk losing federal funds and being subject to prosecution.โ€

___

The Associated Pressโ€™ education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find APโ€™sย standardsย for working with philanthropies, aย listย of supporters and funded coverage areas at AP.org.